Wooden structures in the form of a hypar: modeling, analysis, and comparison of three structural variants

Authors

  • R.V. Pasichnyk* Ph.D. in Engineering, Associate Professor Lutsk National Technical University
  • A.P. Pavliuk Ph.D. in Engineering, Associate Professor National University of Water and Environmental Engineering
  • S. V. Rotko Ph.D. in Engineering, Associate Professor Lutsk National Technical University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36910/6775-2410-6208-2025-14(24)-24

Keywords:

deformability, stresses, compression, bending element, hypar, wooden shell, ribbed frame, combined system.

Abstract

The article investigates the spatial behavior of wooden structural systems shaped as a hypar, using the roof of the Summer Theater in Kyiv as a case study. The geometric model of the roof was constructed by approximating the real form with a hyperbolic paraboloid surface, which made it possible to accurately represent the curvature and ensure the adequacy of subsequent numerical analysis. The calculations were performed using the finite element method in the LIRA-SAPR software, taking into account geometric nonlinearity, the specific spatial behavior of wood, and the influence of the curved form on the stress–strain state.

Three structural configurations were analyzed: a solid wooden shell, a ribbed frame composed of intersecting curved elements, and a combined system of the “shell + ribs” type. For each configuration, stress fields, displacements, and buckling modes were obtained, and the deformation behavior under identical boundary conditions was evaluated. A comparison of the stress state in the directions of the principal curvatures, an analysis of out-of-plane deformation behavior, and an assessment of the influence of rib elements on the redistribution of internal forces were performed.

The results show that the combined wooden system provides the smallest deflections (10–12 mm), the highest buckling coefficient (λcr = 3.4–3.8), and a uniform stress distribution across the surface. The solid shell exhibits stable membrane behavior and moderate displacements but is sensitive to local buckling phenomena. The ribbed frame demonstrates the largest deflections, reduced stiffness, and a non-uniform distribution of internal forces, which limits its independent application without additional reinforcement. It is shown that combining a thin wooden shell with spatial stiffening ribs is the most effective solution for lightweight roofs of complex geometry, ensuring an optimal balance of stiffness, stability, and material efficiency.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Шваб’юк, В. І., & Ротко, С. В. (2015). Лінійне деформування, міцність і стійкість композитних оболонок середньої товщини. Луцьк: РВВ ЛНТУ.

2. Babych, Y. M., Andriichuk, O. V., Uzhehov, S. O., Pasichnyk, R. V., & Kysliuk, D. Y. (2019). Determination of stresses in thin-walled steel fiber reinforced concrete roofs in the form of hyperbolic paraboloid. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 708, Article 012042. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/708/1/012042

3. Pasichnyk, R., Pasichnyk, O., Uzhegova, O., Andriichuk, O., & Bondarskii, O. (2020). Calculation optimization of complex shape shells by numerical method. In V. Ivanov et al. (Eds.), Advances in Design, Simulation and Manufacturing II (DSMIE 2019) (pp. 643–652). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22365-6_64

4. Robeller, C., & von Haaren, N. (2020). Recycleshell: Wood-only shell structures made from cross-laminated timber (CLT) production waste. Journal of the International Association for Shell and Spatial Structures, 61(2), 125–139. https://doi.org/10.20898/j.iass.2020.204.045

5. Arnold, M., Dietsch, P., & Winter, S. (2023, June 19–22). Hyperbolic paraboloid shells made of diagonal laminated timber elements. In World Conference on Timber Engineering (WCTE 2023), Oslo, Norway.

6. Adriaenssens, S., Block, P., Veenendaal, D., & Williams, C. (2014). Shell structures for architecture: Form finding and optimization. Routledge.

7. Nguyen, T. T., Stangier, M., & Torero, J. (2021). Numerical assessment of CLT shell structures under mechanical loading. Engineering Structures, 234, 111977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.111977

8. Gelber, A., & Barber, D. (2019). Structural performance of timber gridshells: A review. Construction and Building Materials, 227, 116660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.116660

9. Glymph, J., Shelden, D., Ceccato, C., Mussel, J., & Schober, H. (2004). A parametric strategy for free-form glass structures using quadrilateral grids. Automation in Construction, 13(2), 187–202.

Published

2025-12-24

How to Cite

Pasichnyk, R., Pavliuk, A., & Rotko, S. V. (2025). Wooden structures in the form of a hypar: modeling, analysis, and comparison of three structural variants. Modern Technologies and Methods of Calculations in Construction, 24, 293-307. https://doi.org/10.36910/6775-2410-6208-2025-14(24)-24

Most read articles by the same author(s)