A Methodology for Ranking Urban Road Segments Based on Morning/Evening Peak Load and Average Speed
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36910/6775-2410-6208-2026-15(25)-30Keywords:
urban road network; road segments; congestion load; congestion index; spatiotemporal analysisAbstract
The paper proposes a calculation-based methodology for spatiotemporal assessment of operating conditions of an urban road network at the road-segment level. The input data comprise geospatial indicators of traffic load and average speed during the morning (AM) and evening (PM) periods. To ensure comparability across segments, min–max normalization is applied and a composite Congestion Index (CI) is constructed, integrating load and speed into a single dimensionless scale and enabling segment ranking by the level of operational deficiency. The methodology includes: forming a unified analytical dataset for road segments; computing CI separately for AM and PM; determining the maximum value, CImax, as an aggregated characteristic of peak-period criticality; and quantifying inter-period changes in operating conditions using ΔCI = CIpm − CIam. Based on CIam, CIpm, and ΔCI, segments are ranked and priority sections are identified for first-order traffic management or infrastructure interventions (signal timing optimization, improvement of traffic schemes, and localized capacity enhancement measures). The methodology is validated using an urban network dataset (case study: Ternopil), which makes it possible to compile a list of segments with the highest congestion-index values in AM/PM and to identify sections exhibiting the greatest deterioration of traffic conditions in the evening period. The proposed approach is reproducible and can be implemented in GIS and/or spreadsheet environments for regular monitoring, comparison of alternative traffic organization schemes, and preparation of analytical inputs for engineering design decisions in urban construction. The results can serve as an engineering-analytical basis for prioritizing design solutions and planning measures aimed at improving the efficiency of urban road network operation.
Downloads
References
1. ДБН Б.2.2-12:2019. (2019). Планування та забудова територій. Міністерство регіонального розвитку, будівництва та житлово-комунального господарства України. https://dbn.co.ua/pay/pub01/dbn-B-2212_planuvannya.pdf
2. Національна транспортна стратегія України на період до 2030 року. (2018). Кабінет Міністрів України. https://publications.chamber.ua/2017/Infrastructure/UDD/National_Transport_Strategy_2030.pdf
3. Transportation Research Board. (2022). Highway capacity manual (7th ed.): A guide for multimodal mobility analysis. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. https://doi.org/10.17226/26432
4. Afrin, T., & Yodo, N. (2020). A Survey of Road Traffic Congestion Measures towards a Sustainable and Resilient Transportation System. Sustainability, 12(11), 4660. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114660
5. Kong, X., Xu, Z., Shen, G., Wang, J., Yang, Q., & Zhang, B. (2016). Urban traffic congestion estimation and prediction based on floating car trajectory data. Future Generation Computer Systems, 61, 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2015.11.013
6. Портал відкритих даних м. Тернополя. (б. д.). Реєстр інтенсивності руху та завантаженості доріг. https://ternopilcity.gov.ua/normative-documents/vidkriti-dani/
7. Google. (n.d.). Speed limits | Roads API. Google Maps Platform. Retrieved March 24, 2026, from https://developers.google.com/maps/documentation/roads/speed-limits
8. TomTom. (2026). Traffic Index e-book: Methodological report. https://www.tomtom.com/traffic-index/
9. Шевчук, О. С., Захарчук, О. П., Фалович, Н. М., Березька, К. М., & Сіран, Р. В. (2024). Концептуальні основи модернізації транспортної інфраструктури середніх міст в Україні. Сучасні технології в машинобудуванні та транспорті, 1(22), 369–377. https://doi.org/10.36910/automash.v1i22.1380
10. Біліченко, В. В., Тарандушка, Л. А., Костьян, Н. Л., & Пилипенко, О. М. (2021). Оптимізація мережі транспорту загального користування на прикладі м. Черкаси. Вісник машинобудування та транспорту, 1(13), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.31649/2413-4503-2021-13-1-13-22
11. de Palma, A., Kilani, M., & Proost, S. (2015). Discomfort in mass transit and its implication for scheduling and pricing. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 71, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2014.10.001




