Multi-criteria synthesis of organizational and technological solutions in the construction of energy-saving civil buildings

Authors

  • S. V. Pastukhova Senior Lecturer Zaporizhzhia National University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36910/6775-2410-6208-2026-15(25)-31

Keywords:

multi-criteria synthesis, industrialized assembly, construction flow, technological gap, energy gap

Abstract

The work is devoted to solving the scientific and applied problem of leveling the «energy gap» of buildings by improving organizational and technological solutions (OTR) directly at the stage of construction and installation works. The relevance of the study is due to the increase in requirements for energy efficiency of modern buildings and the need to ensure that actual energy consumption indicators correspond to design values. A new mathematical model of multi-criteria synthesis is proposed, which formalizes the dependence between the spatial-temporal parameters of construction flows and losses of thermal uniformity of enclosing structures, taking into account the influence of technological breaks, weather conditions and the human factor. Unlike traditional approaches, which are based mainly on calendar planning, the work uses a method of optimizing technological gaps between the processes of installing thermal insulation and its sealing. This allows to minimize the occurrence of defects associated with a violation of the continuity of the thermal insulation contour and reduce heat loss even at the stage of construction of the object. A computational experiment conducted using simulation modeling and variant analysis proves that the transition to industrialized assembly with a high degree of spatial combination generates a significant synergistic effect: the energy consumption of technological processes at the construction stage is reduced by 26,2%, and the subsequent operational energy consumption is reduced by 35,1%.
It was established that despite the local increase in the initial estimated cost by 4%, the integral criterion of technological efficiency increases from 0,84 to 1,11, which indicates the economic feasibility of implementing the proposed solutions in the medium and long term. Additionally, it is substantiated that the optimization of organizational and technological parameters has a positive effect on the quality of work, reduces the risks of hidden defects and increases the reliability of the operational characteristics of buildings.
The proposed organizational and technological model allows you to reduce the construction time of the facility by 21,4%, increase the level of controllability of construction processes and serves as a reliable tool for guaranteeing the achievement of design indicators of buildings with almost zero energy consumption (nZEB), which meets modern European standards of energy efficiency and sustainable development of construction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Про енергетичну ефективність будівель : Закон України від 22.06.2017 № 2118-VIII : станом на 3 серп. 2025 р. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2118-19#Text

2. Директива Європейського Парламенту і Ради 2010/31/ЄС від 19 травня 2010 року про енергетичні характеристики будівель (нова редакція) : Директива Європ. Союзу від 19.05.2010 № 2010/31/ЄС : станом на 24 груд. 2018 р. URL: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/984_011-10#Text

3. ДБН В.2.6-31:2021. Теплова ізоляція та енергоефективність будівель. [На заміну ДБН В.2.6-31:2016; чинний від 2022-09-01]. Вид. офіц. Київ : Мінрегіон України, 2022. 23 с.

4. ДСТУ EN ISO 52016-1:2022. Енергоефективність будівель. Енергопотреби для опалення та охолодження, внутрішні температури і навантаження за явною та прихованою теплотою. Частина 1. Методики розрахунку (EN ISO 52016-1:2017, IDT; ISO 52016-1:2017, IDT). [На заміну ДСТУ Б EN ISO 13790:2011; чинний від 2024-06-01]. Вид. офіц. Київ : ДП «УкрНДНЦ», 2023. 27 с.

5. Pastukhova S., Arutiunian I., Azhazha M. Improvement of organizational and technological solutions considering energy efficiency principles and sustainable development in civil construction. Ways to Improve Construction Efficiency. 2025. Vol. 2, № 55. P. 189-198. URL: https://doi.org/10.32347/2707-501x.2025.55(2).189-198

6. Rother M., Shook J. Learning to See: Value Stream Mapping to Add Value and Eliminate Muda. Brookline : Lean Enterprise Institute, 2003. 102 p.

7. Cano S., Rubiano O. Dynamics Model of the Flow Management of Construction Projects: Study of Case. 28th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction (IGLC), Berkeley, California, USA, 6-10 July 2020. 2020. URL: https://doi.org/10.24928/2020/0110

8. Mota B. P., Viana D. et Isatto E. L. Simulating the Last Planner With Systems Dynamic. 18th Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, Haifa, Israel. 2010. URL: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1345.2327

9. Sacks R. et al. Interaction of Lean and Building Information Modeling in Construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 2010. Vol. 136, № 9. P. 968-980. URL: https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0000203

10. Chen X. et al. BIM-based optimization of camera placement for indoor construction monitoring considering the construction schedule. Automation in Construction. 2021. Vol. 130. P. 103825. URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2021.103825

11. Kozyk V. V., Marushchak U. D., Marko O. Y. Assessment of Energy Efficiency in the Life Cycle of Residential Building Objects. Business Inform. 2024. Vol. 5, № 556. P. 201-207. URL: https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2024-5-201-207

12. Мандрика А. С. та ін. Енергоефективні технології : навчальний посібник ; за заг. ред. А. С. Мандрики. Суми : Сумський державний університет, 2021. 330 с. URL: https://essuir.sumdu.edu.ua/server/api/core/bitstreams/997e7d13-39b2-46ef-9b8d-b9bddc6233b0/content

13. Тугай О. А. та ін. Організація будівельної діяльності : підручник. Київ : «МП Леся», 2018. 247 с.

14. Zavadskas E. K., Turskis Z., Kildienė S. State of art surveys of overviews on MCDM/MADM methods. Technological and Economic Development of Economy. 2014. Vol. 20, № 1. P. 165-179. URL: https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2014.892037

15. AnyLogic: Simulation Modeling Software Tools & Solutions. AnyLogic: Simulation Modeling Software Tools & Solutions : website. URL: https://www.anylogic.com/ (дата звернення: 11.05.2026)

16. Structural Analysis Software. Structural engineering software | Liraland Group : website. URL: https://www.liraland.com/lira/ (дата звернення: 11.05.2026)

Published

2026-05-29

How to Cite

Pastukhova, S. V. (2026). Multi-criteria synthesis of organizational and technological solutions in the construction of energy-saving civil buildings. Modern Technologies and Methods of Calculations in Construction, 25, 416-428. https://doi.org/10.36910/6775-2410-6208-2026-15(25)-31