The effectiveness of BIM technology: analysis of software solutions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.36910/6775-2410-6208-2025-14(24)-13Keywords:
BIM, CAD, urban planning, information modeling, cloud platforms, team interaction, digital twin.Abstract
The article reviews current trends in the implementation of BIM in architectural and civil projects, and assesses the effectiveness of teamwork. Based on the provided statistical data, it was determined that about 70% of construction companies worldwide use BIM technologies [1]. Popular software was analyzed, including Autodesk Revit, Graphisoft ArchiCAD, Bentley OpenBuildings Designer and Allplan Architecture, with Revit remaining the leader among software products. The main problems that were identified at the first stage of the literature review are the lack of unified data exchange standards, limited compatibility between platforms and the complexity of cooperation in multidisciplinary groups. Particular attention was paid to the features of their implementation at different architectural stages, from conceptual urban planning to the proper formation of digital twins. The main advantage of BIM was determined to be the ability of specialists of different profiles to interact in one digital model, thereby increasing the accuracy, consistency and efficiency of project implementation. A team-building efficiency comparison simulation was conducted using the cloud platforms Autodesk BIM360, Graphisoft BIMcloud, Bentley ProjectWise, and Trimble Connect. The study results show that Autodesk Construction Cloud provides the highest degree of integration, version control, and data security, while Bentley is best suited for large infrastructure projects. In addition, the importance of combining BIM and GIS (geographic information system) for the sustainable development of “smart urbanization”, improving the management of urban resources and spatial data, and successfully implementing a unified city concept was also emphasized. Recommendations were provided for the selection of software depending on the type and complexity of the project.
Downloads
References
1. NBS. (2023). Digital Construction Report 2023 [Електронний ресурс]. Newcastle upon Tyne : The NBS. Retrieved from https://www.thenbs.com/digital-construction-report-2023
2. Zou, Y., Kiviniemi, A., & Jones, S. W. (2017). A review of risk management through BIM and BIM-related technologies. Safety Science, 97, 88–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2015.12.027
3. Das, K., Khursheed, S., & Paul, V. K. (2025). The impact of BIM on project time and cost: insights from case studies. Discover Materials, 5, article 25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43939-025-00200-2
4. Trzeciak, M., & Borrmann, A. (2018). Design-to-design exchange of bridge models using IFC: A case study with Revit and Allplan. In Work and eBusiness in Architecture, Engineering and Construction (pp. 9). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429506215-29
5. Waas, L., & Enjellina. (2022). Review of BIM-Based Software in Architectural Design: Graphisoft ArchiCAD vs Autodesk Revit. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Architecture (JARINA), 1(2), 14–22. https://doi.org/10.24002/jarina.v1i2.6016
6. USP Research. (2024). Report Impression Contractor Monitor H2 2024 [Електронний ресурс]. Retrieved from https://www.usp-research.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/Report-Impression-Contractor-Monitor-H2-2024.pdf
7. Habte, B., & Guyo, E. (2021). Application of BIM for structural engineering: a case study using Revit and customary structural analysis and design software. Journal of Information Technology in Construction (ITcon), 26, 1009–1022. https://itcon.org/papers/2021_53-ITcon-Habte.pdf
8. Tan, Y., Liang, Y., & Zhu, J. (2023). CityGML in the Integration of BIM and GIS: Challenges and Opportunities. Buildings, 13(7), Article 1758. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13071758
9. Boccardo, P., La Riccia, L., & Yadav, Y. (2024). Urban Echoes: Exploring the Dynamic Realities of Cities through Digital Twins. Land, 13(5), Article 635. https://doi.org/10.3390/land13050635
10. Chielaru B. (2025). BIM and cloud-based tools integration for BREEAM in educational buildings. Journal of Building Engineering. 26 (7). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2025.1015634
11. Ali, S. B. M., Mehdipoor, A., Johari, N. S., Hasanuzzaman, M., & Rahim, N. A. (2022). Modeling and Performance Analysis for High-Rise Building Using ArchiCAD: Initiatives towards Energy-Efficient Building. Energy Technology and Sustainable Energy Systems, 14(15), Article 9780. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159780
12. Синій, С., Крантовська, О. М., Ксьоншкевич, Л. М., Ксьоншкевич, А., & Сунак, П. (2024). Роль інформаційно-комунікаційних технологій у методології досліджень об’єктів будівництва. Сучасні технології та методи розрахунків у будівництві, (21), 198–206. https://doi.org/10.36910/6775-2410-6208-2024-11(21)-21
