Comparative analysis of comprehensive software packages for geotechnical numerical modelling

Authors

  • O. A. Ovcharenko Ph.D. in Engineering, Associate Professor Kharkiv National Automobile and Highway University
  • V. S. Fitarov PhD student Kharkiv National Automobile and Highway University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36910/6775-2410-6208-2026-15(25)-15

Keywords:

soil-structure interaction, constitutive soil models, piles, combined piled-raft foundation, geotechnical numerical modelling, PLAXIS 3D, MIDAS GTS NX

Abstract

The article considers the issue of selecting universal software packages for geotechnical numerical modelling of the soil-structure interaction system. The relevance of the study is determined by the need to account for the spatial behaviour of the soil mass, construction staging, contact interaction, seepage processes, and nonlinear soil behaviour. The aim of the study is to perform a comparative analysis of universal software packages for geotechnical modelling and to determine their comparative suitability for typical geotechnical design tasks and tasks of increased engineering complexity. The main groups of software are systematized: universal geotechnical software packages, general-purpose numerical modelling software packages, and specialized programs for specific geotechnical calculations. PLAXIS 3D, MIDAS GTS NX, FLAC3D, ZSoil, and Abaqus were selected for detailed comparison. The assessment was performed according to five criteria: soil model libraries, modelling of foundation systems, support for staged construction, automation of calculations and result processing, calculation stability and convergence control. PLAXIS 3D achieved the highest total score, demonstrating the most balanced capabilities for engineering geotechnical modelling. MIDAS GTS NX also showed high suitability, particularly for foundation systems and staged construction tasks. FLAC3D is appropriate for problems involving pronounced nonlinearity, large deformations, and geomechanical features. ZSoil provides sufficient functionality, provided that the numerical formulation is properly controlled. Abaqus is effective for nonstandard contact and research-oriented tasks. However, it requires more extensive methodological preparation. The obtained results can be used when selecting a software package for modelling foundation soils, foundations, and soil-structure interaction systems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Bapir, B., Abrahamczyk, L., Wichtmann, T., & Prada-Sarmiento, L. F. (2023). Soil-structure interaction: A state-of-the-art review of modeling techniques and studies on seismic response of building structures. Frontiers in Built Environment, 9, 1120351. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2023.1120351

2. Firoozi, A. A., Naji, M., & Firoozi, A. A. (2023). Effects of soil-structure interaction on performance of bridges during earthquakes. Case study: Integral abutment bridge in Pennsylvania, USA. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering, 47, 3487-3505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-023-01122-w

3. Chimdesa, F. F., Chimdesa, F. F., Jilo, N. Z., Hulagabali, A., Babalola, O. E., Tiyasha, T., Ramaswamy, K., Kumar, A., & Bhagat, S. K. (2023). Numerical analysis of pile group, piled raft, and footing using finite element software PLAXIS 2D and GEO5. Scientific Reports, 13, 15875. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-42783-x

4. Chanda, D., Saha, R., Haldar, S., & Choudhury, D. (2023). State-of-the-art review on responses of combined piled raft foundation subjected to seismic loads using static and dynamic approaches. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 169, 107869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2023.107869

5. Wang, Z., Cai, J., Wei, P., Yang, X., & Xu, Y. (2025). Optimization of pile reinforcement in soft soils: A numerical analysis. Applied Sciences, 15(23), 12443. https://doi.org/10.3390/app152312443

6. Deb, P., & Pal, S. K. (2019). Numerical analysis of piled raft foundation under combined vertical and lateral loading. Ocean Engineering, 190, 106431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106431

7. Bentley Systems. (2025). PLAXIS 3D 2025.1 manuals. Дата звернення: 09.05.2026. https://bentleysystems.service-now.com/community?id=kb_article&sysparm_article=KB0107989

8. MIDAS IT. (2019). GTS NX on-line manual. Дата звернення: 09.05.2026. https://manual.midasuser.com/en_common/GTS%20NX/310/GTS_NX/Welcome_to_GTS_NX/Intro.htm

9. Itasca Consulting Group. (2025). FLAC (FLAC2D/FLAC3D): Itasca software 9.0 documentation. Дата звернення: 09.05.2026. https://docs.itascacg.com/itasca900/flac3d/docproject/source/flac3dhome.html

10. GeoDev. (2026). ZSoil 2026 theoretical manual. Дата звернення: 09.05.2026. https://www.zsoil.com/zsoil_manual/TM-Man.pdf

11. Dassault Systèmes. (2024). Abaqus 2024 documentation. Дата звернення: 09.05.2026. https://docs.software.vt.edu/abaqusv2024/English/

Published

2026-05-29

How to Cite

Ovcharenko, O. A., & Fitarov, V. S. (2026). Comparative analysis of comprehensive software packages for geotechnical numerical modelling. Modern Technologies and Methods of Calculations in Construction, 25, 197-212. https://doi.org/10.36910/6775-2410-6208-2026-15(25)-15