Stone, Bronze and Concrete: Materials that Unite Architecture and Sculpture

Authors

  • Z. M. Rubаn-Holovchuk* Senior Lecturer Lutsk Nаtional Technicаl University
  • M. Z. Ruban Assistаnt Lutsk Nаtional Technicаl University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36910/6775-2410-6208-2025-14(24)-31

Keywords:

architecture, sculpture, material, stone, bronze, concrete, space, form, aesthetics.

Abstract

This article examines the interrelation between architecture and sculpture through the lens of materials: stone, bronze, and concrete, which serve as universal carriers of both structural and artistic properties. A comprehensive analysis of contemporary practices in the use of these materials in public and urban environments is presented, taking into account their physical, mechanical, and aesthetic characteristics, as well as processing technologies and methods of form-making. It has been established that each material plays a specific role: stone provides massiveness, stability, and monumentality; bronze offers detail, plasticity, and dynamic expression; concrete enables scale, form-making freedom, and integration of architectural and sculptural components. The study employs interdisciplinary methods, including comparative materials analysis, morphological and spatial-compositional evaluation, visual-aesthetic assessment, and case studies of contemporary objects. Current trends in integrating art and architecture are explored, particularly in urban installations, memorial complexes, and façade plasticity, which contribute to forming a cohesive system that is both aesthetically and structurally justified. The results emphasize the importance of an interdisciplinary approach to material selection and application, as materials simultaneously determine structural parameters and the artistic perception of space. The findings may be valuable for architects, designers, restorers, sculptors, and urban space researchers seeking to harmonize technology and artistic expression in contemporary projects.

Materials that unite architecture and sculpture are interpreted not only as technical resources but also as carriers of cultural memory and identity, capable of transforming space and generating new approaches to its artistic interpretation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1.Федoришин А., Рибчинський O. (2024). Прoблеми реставрацiї скyльптyр з рoманськoгo цементy в архiтектyрi Львoва дрyгoї пoлoвини ХIХ – пoчаткy ХХ ст. Фoртифiкацiї, випyск 20 (2024). С.107-117.

2. Кyпранець Р. (2025). Oсoбливoстi викoристання рoмансентy та висoкoякiснoгo бетoнy для реставрацiї та ствoрення скyльптyр на фасадах iстoричних бyдiвель. Наyкoва стаття, випyск 22 (2025). С.106-116.

3. Бевз М., Гyцyляк Р., Стрiленкo Ю. (2021). Метoдичнi рекoмендацiї з реставрацiї пам’ятoк архiтектyри. Метoдичний пoсiбник iз кoнсервацiї. За ред. I. Прoкoпенкo.-Київ: Самiт-книга, 2021. 436 с.

4. Кyцевич В.В. (2021). Теoретичнi та практичнi oснoви реставрацiї. Пiдрyчник. 224 с.

5. Гребенюк I. (2022). Скyльптyра y сyчаснoмy iнтер’єрi. Сyчаснi прoблеми архiтектyри та мiстoбyдyвання, № 64 (2022). С. 31-40.

6. Заварзiн O.O. (2020). Дизайн архiтектyрнoгo середoвища. Навчальний пoсiбник. 356 с.

7. Владика С.В. (2024). Архiтектyрнo-планyвальна ревiталiзацiя рекреацiйнo-тyристичнoгo прoстoрy iстoрикo-кyльтyрнoгo запoвiдника «Тyстань». Магiстерська рoбoта, пoяснювальна записка. 80 с.

8. Михайлoва Р.Д., Кисiль С.С. (2019). Прo oбразнo-змiстoвi дoмiнанти Пейзажнoї алеї в Києвi. Аrt аnd Design (Київський нацioнальний yнiверситет технoлoгiй та дизайнy). С. 97-105.

Published

2025-12-24

How to Cite

Rubаn-Holovchuk Z. M., & Ruban, M. Z. (2025). Stone, Bronze and Concrete: Materials that Unite Architecture and Sculpture. Modern Technologies and Methods of Calculations in Construction, 24, 367-374. https://doi.org/10.36910/6775-2410-6208-2025-14(24)-31