Automatic Diagnostics of Drill Condition by Several Diagnostic Signs

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.36910/4293-52779-2025-17-02-03

Keywords:

twist drill, tool condition monitoring, drill wear, power sensor, axial drilling force sensor

Abstract

A key problem in mechanical engineering is the prediction of tool wear in real time. Traditional methods rely on conservative tool replacement, which leads to premature tool replacement or excessive tool wear, as well as increased production downtime. Manual assessment of drill condition is time-consuming. To reduce downtime, it is necessary to perform the process of diagnosing the drill condition in production conditions automatically, with high accuracy. Automatic tool condition monitoring systems have shown great potential for detecting and predicting tool wear, reducing the risk of tool breakage and optimizing tool change intervals, but the prediction accuracy is not always sufficient. This study presents an automatic system for predicting tool life in real time, which helps to solve this limitation by integrating several control modules. The prediction system includes machine-mounted modules for direct control of feed force and cutting power consumption signals, a signal integration module by connecting them for real-time data management, and a data processing module for predicting tool wear. In the last module, based on these signals, an integral indicator of drill wear is generated, the degree of approximation of which to the permissible wear value determines the condition of the drill as “fit for work” or “unfit for work”. Obviously, an approach of model aggregation in machine learning is proposed here, when several models are combined to obtain better results than any individual model gives in order to increase the accuracy, stability and generalization ability of the diagnostic system. The paper uses an aggregated forecasting model based on the use of the axial cutting force signal and the power consumed by the spindle signal to control tool wear.

References

[1] K. Javed, R. Gouriveau, X. Li, N. Zerhouni, Tool wear monitoring and prognostics challenges: a comparison of connectionist methods toward an adaptive ensemble model, J. of Intelligent Manufacturing 29 (2018) 1873–1890. doi:10.1007/s10845-016-1221-2.

[2] K. Salonitis, A. Kolios, Reliability assessment of cutting tool life based on surrogate approximation methods, The Int. J. of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 71 (2014) 1197–1208. doi:10.1007/ s00170-013-5560-2.

[3] J. Karandikar, T. McLeay, S. Turner, T. Schmitz, Tool wear monitoring using naive bayes classifiers, The Int. J. of Advanced Manufacturing Tech-nology 77 (2015) 1613–1626. doi:10.1007/s00170-014-6560-6.

[4] A. Gouarir, S. Kurokawa, T. Sajima, M. Murata, In-process tool wear detection of uncoated square end mill based on electrical contact resis-tance, Int. J. of Automation Technology 10 (5) (2016) 767–772. doi: 10.20965/ijat.2016.p0767.

[5] T. Mohanraj, S. Shankar, R. Rajasekar, N. Sakthivel, A. Pramanik, Tool condition monitoring techniques in milling processa review, J. of Mate-rials Research and Technology 9 (1) (2020) 1032–1042. doi:10.1016/ j.jmrt.2019.10.031.

[6] R. Teti, D. Mourtzis, D. D’Addona, A. Caggiano, Process monitoring of machining, CIRP Ann. 71 (2) (2022) 529–552. doi:10.1016/j.cirp. 2022.05.009.

[7] R. Corne, C. Nath, M. El Mansori, T. Kurfess, Study of spindle power data with neural network for predicting real-time tool wear/breakage during inconel drilling, J. of Manufacturing Systems 43 (2017) 287–295. doi: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2017.01.004.

[7] Abu-Mahfouz I, Banerjee A (2014) Drill wear feature identification under varying cutting conditions using vibration and cutting force signals and data mining techniques. Proc Comput Sci 36:556–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2014.09.054

[8] Yaldız, S. and Ünsaçar, F.: Design, development and testing of a turning dynamometer for cutting force measurement, Mater. Design, 27, 839–846, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2005.04.001

[9] Ciurezu Gherghe, L. M., Stanimir, A., and Geonea, I.: Experimental research regarding the influence of cutting regime on the wear of drills at steel processing, Fiability & Durability Supplement No 1/2015, Publishing House “Academica Brâncu ¸si”, Târgu Jiu, Romania, 118–122, ISSN 1844-640X, available at: https://www.utgjiu.ro/rev_mec/mecanica/pdf/2015-01 .

[10] Патент US 4207567, МПК G08B 21/00; опубл. 10.06.1980

[11] Патент US 10,493,583 B2, МПК B23Q 15/16; G08B 24/10, опубл. 3.12.2019.

[12] Wang Q., Zhang D., Tang K. et al. A mechanics based prediction model for tool wear and power consumption in drilling operations / Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, (234), рр. 171–184, DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.148.

[13] Espressif Systems. ESP32. Available online: https://surl.li/smlcgc (accessed on 10 December 2024).

[14] Zemic L6D. Available online: https://zemic.com.ua/tenzometrychnyi-datchyk-l6d/ (accessed on 10 December 2024).

Published

2025-12-19

How to Cite

Automatic Diagnostics of Drill Condition by Several Diagnostic Signs. (2025). Technological Complexes, 17(2), 29-43. https://doi.org/10.36910/4293-52779-2025-17-02-03

Most read articles by the same author(s)